Getting over the Filipino’s Hump: Rizal’s Appeal to the Youth at the End of the Filibusterismo
- Dr. Paul Dumol

- 2 days ago
- 2 min read
By Dr. Paul Arvisu Dumol
At the end of Rizal’s Filibusterismo, after Simoun’s death and while P. Florentino’s servants attend to the corpse, P. Florentino murmurs:
Where are the youth who should consecrate their rosy hours, their dreams and enthusiasm to the good of their homeland? Where are they who should pour out their blood generously to wash away so much shame, so many crimes, so much abomination? The victim has to be pure and unstained for the holocaust to be acceptable!... Where are you, young men and women, who should embody the vital vigour that has fled our veins, the purity of ideas that has been stained in our brains and the fire of enthusiasm which has been snuffed out in our hearts?... We await you, young men and women, come; we await you! [284-85: translation mine]
The passage is charged with high rhetoric, and so can we be blamed if we see the priest’s words as a series of rhetorical questions, not to be taken literally, as a high-flown roundabout way of praising the youth, of reminding them that they are (as the author had called them twelve years earlier in “A la juventud filipina”) “la bella esperanza de la patria”?
If we take the priest’s words literally, however, then they become a condemnation of the adults in Rizal’s novel; if we understand P. Florentino to be the mouthpiece of Rizal himself, as generations of readers have taken him to be, and the universe of the Fili to be none other than the Philippines of Rizal‘s time, then his words become Rizal’s condemnation of the Filipinos of his time, in fact—shall I say it?—of his own generation and the generation before him. And the youth do not escape Rizal’s condemnation: the first sentence may be read to mean that the youth P. Florentino was in touch with were precisely those who did not “consecrate their rosy hours, their dreams and enthusiasm to the good of their homeland,” prompting the secular priest to look for those who did. Thus, P. Florentino, and thus, Rizal: Rizal had a dim view of the Filipino youth he was in touch with in the years he wrote the Fili: 1890-1891.
There are letters and events that I could cite in support of this claim. Just three days ago I delivered a conference before student leaders in Baguio on precisely this topic. In this brief talk, however, I want to approach the same topic from a different angle. I want to explore it in light of Rizal’s other works.
Read the Complete Essay
This article continues in its original scholarly format, including citations and footnotes.

Comments